Best Of
Re: Students Who Apply for Every Scholarship Without Reading Requirements/Preferences
Hi @DeborahClark - I will echo the use of the Eligibility Quiz, which you can structure to help narrow the results on what processes the students will match to. You will of course need to put the appropriate Eligibility Rules in each of your processes so the quiz functions the best way possible for you. We were previously set up that way, with use of the Eligibility Quiz and 34 possible opportunities. Having the Quiz be the only item visible to the applicant first requires them to complete it in order to return matches. They are then able to then apply for the items they match to. Another way to work through it is to have some of the initial questions in the application help determine whether or not the person is actually eligible and utilize branching questions to open the remainder of the application questions to them (or not) based on the responses. That can also help limit ineligible applicants. (We actually made the shift to the Universal Application just last year with this year being the first time it was live in our portal - I also have some scholarships that have specific criteria, but the way we were able to setup the opportunities and structure the application, we made the transition successfully. Even there, I am going to do a little more with branching questions, and you're also able to set certain items specific to an opportunity, so it only comes available if the student matches to the opportunity.) Your success consultant can be very helpful to you (as well as the support team) - they're more than happy to get things placed in your Sandbox where you can test it out first before moving to your live site. I'm sure you'll be able to find a route that will work best for your process.
Re: Handling increased volume and managing workflow more efficiently?
Hi Katie,
At the Hamilton Family Charitable Trust we use the Letter of Intent to identify which projects we want to invite for application. To answer your questions:
- Have any foundations moved away from an open LOI process and shifted to working primarily with returning applicants?
- We have not shifted to working primarily returning applicants. For our 2026 to counteract the disruptions from funding shifts we have decided to continue funding our existing relationships with an additional payment. We continue to use the LOI to decide the best projects to invite to apply.
- Has anyone limited LOI submissions in a way that helps ensure organizations are a better fit before applying?
- This is exactly how we use the Letter of Intent form. We also provide feedback on the submission and use the Letter of Intent to strengthen the information prior to submission. It also allows for increased clarity on the design of the request.
- How do you communicate funding priorities and eligibility in a way that reduces misaligned applications without discouraging strong ones?
- We use the eligibility quiz to reinforce our requirements and to prevent ineligible organizations from submitting our LOI.
Re: Do other organizations have professional liability coverage?
Hi Meghan,
Great question! This is something we’ve seen come up from time to time, especially as organizations expand their advisory role with donor-advised funds.
While we’re not able to provide guidance on specific insurance decisions, we can share a bit of context from what we’ve observed across foundations:
- Many organizations evaluate professional liability (errors & omissions) coverage when their role includes advisory or recommendation-based interactions with fundholders
- The level of coverage (or whether it’s pursued at all) often depends on how formalized that advisory role is. For example, whether guidance is framed as educational vs. directive
- Some foundations also revisit their policies, disclaimers, and documentation practices alongside insurance considerations to help clarify the nature of their role
This is definitely an area where peer insight is especially valuable. I'm curious to hear how others in the community are approaching this and what factors influenced your decision.
Appreciate you raising this!
Best,
Mark Bejcek
Client Success Consultant
Foundant Technologies.

